[Home] [Current Edition] [Compendium] [Forum] [Web Archive]
[Email Archive] [Guestbook] [Subscribe] [Advertising Rates]
ARRAY Logo icon

Internet Banking Adoption Factors in Finland


By Minna Mattila, Professor of Marketing, Heikki Karjaluoto, Ph.D. Candidate, Tapio Pento, Professor of Marketing, University of Jyvaskyla, School of Business and Economics

Email: mimaja@econ.jyu.fi

 

Abstract

This paper finds out factors which have defined consumers' adoption of Internet banking in Finland. Finland is a world leader in electronic banking, and over 39.8 percent of all the banking transactions were made over the Internet. Using the data of a large survey, we develop a cognitive model of the factors which affect the adoption of Internet banking. Prior technology experience, personal banking experience, reference group influence, and security concerns are found to be the main factors, and demographic characteristics and overall perceptions about Internet banking were found to have a significant effect on the adoption.


Introduction

Several studies suggest that the Internet has become a popular delivery platform for electronic banking (Sheshunoff, 2000; Oyegoke, 1999; Birch, 1999; Evans and Wurster, 1997). Personal banking is no longer time nor location bounded. Electronic banking customers are offered an easy access to their accounts 24 hours per day, seven days a week. Regardless of this convenience, adoption rates of electronic banking in most countries have been very low. Only the banks in Finland report that most of their customers regularly bank over the Internet, and that over 70 percent visit a bank branch less than 2 times per year. It is, therefore, of interest to ascertain and understand the factors that drive Finnish bank customers online.

As the consumer behavior on the Internet still remains a rather uncharted territory, this study is founded on traditional attitude-behavior modeling. We first gathered factors that we thought a priori to influence the adoption of Internet banking either positively or negatively. We then collected data with a large mail survey, and further verified this data with in-depth interviews. The theory of reasoned action by Ajzen and Fishbein (1980) and technology acceptance model by Davis et al. (1989) provide the foundation of our attitude-behavior model of consumers? Internet banking. We also study the effect of demographic factors on the adoption rate.

Literature review

Individual differences in consumer behavior have been found to be associated with the acceptance of new information technologies such as Internet banking (see e.g., Zmud 1979; Nelson, 1990; Crisp et al., 1997). A typical Internet banking user is found to be a highly educated, young, and a relatively wealthy person with a good understanding of computers and especially the Internet. It has been also reported that demographic factors have a great impact on consumers' perceptions and intentions toward Internet banking (Daniel, 1999; Sathye, 1999; Jayawardhena and Foley, 2000; Karjaluoto et al., 2001).

Technology experience

Prior technology experience, especially prior computer experience have been found to impact consumers' beliefs about related systems and information technology (DeLone, 1988; Igbaria et al., 1995). Au et al. (2000) extended this idea tot he observation that the more experience consumer has about technology, the better will she understand new technologies and their ramifications. Thus, consumer's familiarity with technologies in general facilitates her appreciation of the potential added value which is inherent in a technology.

Trocchia and Janda (2000) introduce this logic to the realm of the Internet by arguing that consumers' adoption rate of the Internet is associated with their past experiences with the technologies. Non-users' negative experiences were suggested to have a great impact on their perceptions about the Internet. This logic is in line with the classic attitude theories of Fishbein and Ajzen (1975, p.14), who claim that the more positive the person's past experience about an object is, the more positive beliefs he will hold about it. As a result, the positive beliefs create positive perceptions.

Fisher (2000) corroborates this by proposing that the most important reason for adopting Internet based services is 'each consumer's attitude toward technology itself, raging from eagerly accepting to profoundly suspicious'. A direct consequence of these earlier studies is the hypothesis that a negative prior technology experience and especially negative computer experience, has a negative impact on the adoption of Internet banking, and vice versa. This hypothesis will be empirically tested below.

Personal banking experience

Consumer behavior research has also studied the relationship between a person's experiences onto her behavior. In general, beliefs and attitudes are largely the result of personal experiences about a given object (see e.g. Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975, p.10; Peter and Olson, 1990, p.142). We hypothesize that satisfied bank customers have more positive perceptions also about Internet banking and, thus, are more likely to move online. A dissatisfied branch office customer may try Internet banking, but only a satisfied customers adopt Internet banking as their regular bill payment mode.

Reference group influence

Consumer behavior literature also suggests that reference groups, such as a social reference group,  may impact on person's behavior (Fishbein, 1967, p.477; Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975, p.495). Two competing influences have been identified on the relationship between subjective norm and behavior: conformity and dissension (Snyder and Fromkin, 1977; Baumeister, 1982; Guerin, 1986; Simonson and Nowlis, 2000). Conformity is the result of people trying to conform to a subjective norm, thereby avoiding criticism and rejection.

Dissension measures consumer's independence of the subjective norm, and is a reflection of strong self-respect and autonomy. A dissenting consumer is thus an individual, unique, special, and separable from the masses (Snyder, 1992). The central role of the subjective norm in consumers' behavior has been empirically verified from several angles. Bagozzi (2000) has shown that when the subjective norm is measured by social factors and focus, it is a strong determinant of consumer behavior. On the other hand, Taylor (1991, p.55) argues that most people try to surround themselves with people and things that are consistent with their own identities.

The consumption of banking services may be influenced by several reference groups of the customer such as the personnel of the bank and traditional ones such as friends and family. We hypothesize that reference groups do influence the adoption of Internet banking, and modify the hypothesis with the statement that even if Internet banking usage may be initiated by a certain reference group such as banking personnel, the continuance of the use of Internet banking depends more on other factors, mainly customer's perception about technology in general.

Security challenges

One of the most significant challenges of Internet banking has been consumers' security concerns about Internet banking. Security has been identified as one of the biggest barriers for the uptake of Internet banking (see e.g. Sathye, 1999). Mattila's (2001, p.129-133) empirical study points out that Finnish Internet banking customers do not pay excessive attention to security concerns. We continue this line of thought and hypothesize that security concerns have no impact on the adoption of Internet banking.

Demographics

The effect of demographics has been found to be very a significant determinant of behavior in various studies concerning electronic banking. High income, relatively young age, and good education have been found explaining the acceptance of Internet banking. In addition, a typical Internet banking user has been identified as a high involvement person belonging to the upper middle class or in parts as a member of the career-orientated upper middle class (Roemer and Buhl, 1996; Jayawardhena and Foley, 2000).

The technology acceptance literature points a strong relationship between age and the acceptance of new technologies (e.g. Gattiker, 1992; Harrison et al., 1992).  Older consumers are found to have problems with new technologies, and hence, are expected to have negative attitudes toward innovations. Trocchia and Janda (2000), for instance, indicate that many older consumers possess more negative intention to change. However, they argue that person's overall perception of technology affects more than the age.

Gender has also been suggested as a factor of Internet banking adoption. Some studies argue that the Internet is male dominated (e.g. Computer Industry Almanac, 2000). In Finland the latest research counts that 45 percent of the Internet users are female (Statistics Finland, 2000). We are interested in examining whether demographic variables such as age, education, profession, and household income have an influence on Internet banking usage.

Perceptions' relationship to behavior

Attitudes put people into a frame of mind of liking or disliking things, of moving toward or away from them. In other words, overall perceptions about Internet banking are expected to divide consumers into non-users and users. Moreover, we believe that especially computer perceptions have an effect on Internet banking usage.

We conducted an extensive literature review in the area of attitude development and attitude-behavior relationships in order to develop our model. Models such as the theory of reasoned action (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980) and the technology acceptance model (Davis et al., 1989) have influenced our model. However, we used abductive reasoning in the model development, i.e. the development is based on both theoretical background and empirical findings. The model is expected to provide a practical tool for understanding the factors that drive the adoption of Internet banking.

Research methodology

The data of this research was collected by means of a questionnaire sent by mail to 3000 individual bank customers in Finland. After a follow-up round a total of 1201 questionnaires were received of which 1167 were used in the data analysis. The response rate was 38.9 percent. The survey sample consisted of three consumer segments (non-users, new users, old users) that differed in terms of Internet banking experience. Thus, the questionnaire was also partly tailored. However, in this particular paper, the data is mainly analyzed as one, i.e. only non-users are analyzed separately in the latter part of this paper.

Results

Consumers' use of online banking services in Finland is the highest in the world. Nordea has 1.4 million online customers, and 3.2 million log-ons monthly. Osuuspankki Group is the second largest bank group in Finland with 500 000 online customers. All the banks offer a full line of Internet services: basic banking services, stock and bond trading, loan applications, consumption and education loan decisions, electronic bill presentment, international payments, and electronic salary presentment.

The demographics in table 1 show that the respondents of the sample are quite representative of the population in Finland on several variables (for more information see www.stat.fi. However, the age distribution of this sample differs from the national one by being more older people oriented. The age mode of our sample was between 35-49 years whereas 22.4 percent of Finnish population belong in this age group. Less than one percent in our sample were under 24 years compared to 30.6 percent of the total population. This difference may be partially explained by the fact that many young bank customers were not reached at their permanent address, to which the questionnaire was sent. Also one must keep in mind that only few children or teenagers actually own their own bank account, and therefore they may not be listed as customers in the bank's customer database.

The income of the respondents was also somewhat higher than that of the nation's consumers, but this is explained by the fact that the stratified sample intentionally produced an overrepresentation of the users of Internet banking, and these users tend to have more income. Over 42 % of all respondents had an annual income over 37842e whereas the national average annual income was 25380e year 2000.

Table 1. Profile of respondents

Demographic characteristics

Frequency

Percentage

Valid percent

Cumulative
percentage

Gender

 

 

 

 

Male

601

51.4

51.5

51.5

Female

565

48.3

48.5

100.0

Missing

1

0.1

 

 

Total

1167

100.0

 

 

Age

 

 

 

 

Under 34 years of age

128

11.0

11.0

11.0

35-49 years

459

39.3

39.4

50.3

50-64 years

369

31.6

31.6

82.0

65 years and over

210

18.0

18.0

100.0

Missing

1

0.1

 

 

Total

1167

100.0

 

 

Household Income

 

 

 

 

Less than 16 819e

206

17.6

18.3

18.3

16 820-25 228e

201

17.2

17.8

36.1

25 229-37 842e

231

19.7

20.5

56.5

More than 37 843e

491

42.0

43.5

100.0

Missing

38

3.5

 

 

Total

1167

100.0

 

 

Marital status

 

 

 

 

Married

680

58.1

58.6

58.6

Not married

481

41.1

41.4

88.2

Missing

6

0.8

 

 

Total

1167

100.0

 

 

Profession

 

 

 

 

Leading position

565

48.4

48.6

48.6

Worker

237

20.3

20.4

69.0

Not at work

361

30.9

31.0

100.0

Missing

4

0.3

 

 

Total

1167

100.0

 

 

At the time of the questionnaire, most of the respondents (39.8%) already paid their bills over the Internet.  Only 12.1 % paid at a branch, and telephone banking was used even less (3.1%).  Considering the very high penetration of  mobile WAP telephones in Finland, it was surprising that mobile banking via WAP is not very common in Finland.   The use rate of Internet should be considered very high, as only 57,8 % of the respondents had a PC and an access to the net.

Table 2. Technology access

% Don't use Mobile Phone in Banking

 

96.8 %

% Uses Mobile Phone in Banking

 

3.2 %

 

WAP

25.0 %

 

Text message

11.1 %

 

Call to Telephone bank

63.8%

Standard deviation

0.4513

 

% No Computer

 

36.5 %

% has a Computer

 

63.5 %

 

At home

83.0 %

 

At work

40.8 %

 

Other

4.6 %

Standard deviation

0.8142

 

% without Internet Access

 

42.2 %

% with Internet Access

 

57.8 %

% Accessing Internet from…

Home

51.3 %

 

Office

45.5 %

 

Other

3.2 %

Standard deviation

0.8485

 

A factor analysis of the correlations between selected variables of our survey was conducted to develop a cognitive model of Internet bank adoption.  Factor analysis was deemed a suitable method because the Kaisers-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) score of sampling adequacy (0.853) was well above the 0.5 recommendation level (Malhorta, 1999), and the Bartlett test of sphericity (0,000) indicated that there was adequate correlation among the chosen variables.  Four factors were identified using principal axis factoring and Varimax rotation (see e.g. Alexander and Colgate, 2000), and by applying the rule that factors, which have an eigenvalue larger than 1.0 should be included (Hair et al. 1995, Alfansi and Sargeant 2000).   The four factors identified explained 55.7 percent of the total variance.  

The first factor, prior computer experience, has heavy loadings for five variables, which all relate to consumers' perception of computer-related technologies.  Non-users score low and old users score high on this factor. Factor two, prior technology experience has loadings for five variables, which relate to consumers' of technology in general.  Surprisingly, we found out that non-users scored quite high on this factor.  The difference between non-users and users was that the non-users liked teletext and ATM and users disliked them.  The third factor, personal banking experience, has high loadings for four variables which all have to do with user-friendliness and speed.  The last factor, reference group influence pertains to three variables on consumers' reaction to the subjective norm regarding whether they should perform a certain behavior or not.

Table 3. Factor analysis of Internet banking adoption barriers

 

Factors

Statement

Prior
 computer experience

Prior technology experience

Personal banking experience

Reference group influence

Internet

.857

 

 

 

E-mail

.847

 

 

 

Computer

.795

 

 

 

E-payment

.498

 

 

 

Mobile phones and services

.439

 

 

 

Automates

 

.766

 

 

Electric ID card

 

.547

 

 

ATM

 

.529

 

 

Teletext

 

.448

 

 

Liking of improvements

 

.353

 

 

Speed

 

 

.684

 

Easy of use

 

 

.629

 

Trustworthiness and security

 

 

.440

 

Free from time and place

 

 

.418

 

Social contacts

 

 

 

.652

Referents' example

 

 

 

.348

Group behavior

 

 

 

.312

Initial eigenvalues

4.909

1.784

1.635

1.139

Total variance explained %

28.876

10.492

9.617

6.697

 

Notes: Extraction method: Principal Axis Factoring

            Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization

Our model of the factors, which affect consumers' adoption of Internet banking, is based on the literature review and the factor analysis results above, see Figure 1.  The model is constructed using both inductive and deductive reasoning, and is built on the premise that three factors, prior technology experience (''=0.70) including computer perception (''=0.90) and prior computer experience (''=0.88),  personal banking experience ('' =0.67), and reference group influence (''=0.61) do influence Internet banking behavior.  In addition, the model indicates a strong relationship between overall perceptions about Internet banking (''=0.78) and the Internet banking usage. Overall perceptions toward Internet banking was measured based on the outcomes of the factors.

The construction of the model by induction from quantitative data may set a limit to its applicability.  A more accurate verification of the model by using our qualitative data from conducted in-depth interviews is included in figure 1. Another limitation of this model is that its data is derived from one sample, and has not been tested with different consumer groups. While non-users and users differ in many parts, the factors in the model may have quite different loadings for different consumer segments.

Figure 1. A cognitive model of the adoption of Internet banking

Notes:

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed);*   Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); Correlation was measured using Pearson and Spearman's rho

To further investigate the relationships we calculated correlations between the factors and actual Internet banking usage. Computer perception variables and demographics, as well as overall perceptions toward Internet banking were added to the correlation matrix highlight the importance of individual differences in Internet banking. Relatively high correlations were found between Internet banking usage and the factors, and the demographics, see table 4.

Table 4. Correlation matrix

Variable

Correlation coefficients

 

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

1.Internet banking usage

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.Prior computer experience

.610**

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.Prior technology experience

.017

.115**

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.Personal banking experience

.207**

.062

.043

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.Reference group influence

-.339**

-.106**

.036

-.045

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.Computer perception

.650**

.903**

.250**

.163**

-.187**

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demographics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.Gender

-.129**

-.100*

.035

.253**

.061

-.086**

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.Age

-.414**

-.245**

-.037

-.019

.065

-.325**

.007

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.Marital status

-.227**

-.056

-.007

-.031

.139**

-.123**

.097**

.091**

1.000

 

 

 

 

 

10.Education

.360**

.192**

.021

.014

-.224**

.263**

-.030

-.246**

-.126**

1.000

 

 

 

 

11.Profession

.527**

.352**

.033

.130**

-.195**

.388**

-.049

-.484**

-.196**

.375**

1.000

 

 

 

12.Household income

.546**

.325**

-.024

.140**

-.293**

.385**

-.162**

-.292**

-.425**

.409**

.542**

1.000

 

 

13.Household size

.213**

.064

.062

.051

-.066

.125**

-.063*

-.134**

-.740**

.103**

.191**

.355**

1.000

 

14. Overall perceptions

.524**

.762**

.499**

.404**

-.097*

.828**

.010

-.197**

-.070

.150**

.289**

.266**

.104**

1.000

Notes:

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

*   Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

Correlation was measured using Pearson and Spearman's rho (non-parametric correlations displayed in gray)

 

Prior computer experience correlates positively with Internet banking usage (r=.610, p<0.01), prior technology experience (r=.115, p<0.01), computer perception (r=.903, p<0.01), education (r=192, p<0.01), profession (r=.352, p<0.01), household income (r=.325, p<0.01), and overall perceptions toward Internet banking (r=.762, p<0.01). Conversely, prior computer experience correlates negatively with reference group influence (r= -.106, p<0.01), and age (r= -.245, p<0.01). Thus, prior computer experience seems to be very good predictor of consumers' adoption of Internet banking. This finding is supported by the previous studies (see e.g. Crisp et al., 1997).

Prior technology experience and demographics and Internet banking usage were not correlated, as was expected a priori. However, a positive correlation was found between prior technology experience and prior computer experience (r=.115, p<0.01), computer perception (r=.250, p<0.01), and overall perceptions toward Internet banking (r=.499, p<0.01).  

Furthermore, personal banking experience correlates positively with Internet banking usage (r=.207, p<0.01), computer perception (r=.163, p<0.01), gender (r=.253, p<0.01), profession (r=.130, p<0.01), household income (r=.140, p<0.01), and overall perceptions toward Internet banking (r=.404, p<0.01).  This implies that personal banking experience mediates consumers' adoption of Internet banking.  It tends to influence more professionals who have positive computer perceptions than women with negative perceptions about Internet banking.

Negative correlations were found between the reference group influence, and Internet banking usage (r= -.339, p<0.01), prior computer experience (r= -.106, p<0.01), computer perception (r= -.187, p<0.01), education (r= -224, p<0.01), profession (r= -.195, p<0.01), household income (r= -.293, p<0.01), and overall perceptions about Internet banking (r= -.097, p<0.05). These results indicate that wealthier consumers are less susceptible to reference group influence when switching their banking to the Internet. No positive correlation was found between this factor and other variables.

Computer perception and Internet banking usage are also correlated (r=.650, p<0.01), and computer perception correlates positively with prior computer experience (r=.903, p<0.01), prior technology experience (r=.250, p<0.01), personal banking experience (r=.163, p<0.01), education (r=.263, p<0.01), profession (r=.388, p<0.01), household income (r=.385, p<0.01), household size (r=.125, p<0.01), and overall perceptions about Internet banking (r=.828, p<0.01). Negative correlation was found between computer perception and reference group influence (r=.187, p<0.01), gender (r=. –086, p<0.01), age (r= -.325, p<0.01), and marital status (r= -.123, p<0.01).

A most important relation is derived from the high correlations, which were found between Internet banking usage and the other variables. As already partly stated, Internet banking usage correlates positively with prior computer experience (r=.610, p<0.01), personal banking experience (r=.207, p<0.01), computer perception (r=.650, p<0.01), education (r=.306, p<0.01), profession (r=.527, p<0.01), household income (r=.546, p<0.01), household size (r=.213, p<0.01), and attitude (r=.524, p<0.01). Internet banking usage is negatively correlated with reference group influence (r= -.339, p<0.01), gender (r= -.129, p<0.01), age (r= -.414, p<0.01), and marital status (r= -.227, p<0.01).   These results imply a strong relationship between demographic characteristics and Internet banking usage. Our results suggest that the adoption of Internet banking depends heavily on the factors outlined in figure 1.

Regression results on intention to use Internet banking

In our regression model, the response variable is intention to use Internet banking, which was measured using a three-point scale ranging from never to often. Predictor variables were chosen by first selecting variables, which correlate highly with the response variable, and then reducing multicollinearity in the model statistical choice methods suggested in the literature (Draper and Smith, 1981: Nummenmaa et al. 1997, p.310).

Table 5. Regression coefficients model on intention(a)

Independent variable

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized coefficients

 

 

t-test

 

 

Significant level

 

B

S.E.

Beta

(Constant)

.352

.085

 

4.122

.000

Computer perception

.422

.030

.452

14.293

.000

Profession

.208

.039

.175

5.324

.000

Reference group influence

-.213

.038

-.172

-5.612

.000

Household income

.191

.041

.158

4.703

.000

Personal banking experience

0.00

.033

.080

2.697

.007

Notes:

a. Dependent variable: Internet banking usage

The regression results displayed in table 5 suggest that computer perception, profession, and household income, have the strongest impact on consumers' intention to use Internet banking. In contrast, reference group influence impacts negatively. Our data explains this with the fact, that whereas the banking personnel may still be most important reference group in initiating the use of Internet banking, customer's own perceptions about technology, and Internet banking mold there final behavior along with the social reference groups' example.

The regression results indicate that profession and household income have a significant impact on the intention to use Internet banking. Additionally, high positive correlations were found between usage and education (r=.360), profession (r=.527), and household income (r=.213). On the contrary, high negative correlation was found between usage rate and age (r= -.414), gender (r= -.129), and marital status (r= -.227) All correlation coefficients were significant, p<0.01. Thus, our results suggest a typical user to be male, relatively young, well-educated, family man, in a good profession.

Barriers of adoption among non-users

To develop more insight into how consumers perceive Internet banking, a second factor analysis was carried out using the 350 respondents who do not use Internet for their banking. We used the same method in this factor analysis as in the first one. The factor loadings are presented in table 6.

Five factors were derived using the same techniques as above.  Bartlett's test value (0,000) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) score (0.512) confirmed sufficient correlation among the variables in the factors. The five factor model explained 76.9 percent of the total variance. The factors are: (1) Importance of new service dimensions in Internet banking, (2) Negative word-of-mouth, (3) Security concerns and other barriers for usage, (4) Less personal workload in Internet banking, (5) Time-consuming. Gronbach's alphas of the factors point out that the internal reliability of the results can be considered sufficient.

The first factor, importance of new service dimensions, refers to new enhancement of Internet banking portal. Seven variables concerning added services loaded this factor. Second factor, negative word-of-mouth, refers simply to the negative grapevine. Among non-users, reference group influence is expected to impact negatively on intention to Internet banking. The factor three can be called security concerns and other usage barriers as the variables loading the factor all refer to significant barriers concerning expenditures, security, and lack of service. The fourth factor can be called workload, because variables loaded this factor refer to less workload. The final factor is called time consuming, as it relates to the time dimension of Internet banking. The effort to learn the practical use of Internet banking is considered quite time consuming among non-users, as we will soon demonstrate.

Table 6. Rotated factor matrix

Non-users' perception of Internet banking

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

Gronbach's Alpha

0.89

0.81

0.78

0.81

0.64

I would use the Internet bank if I could

 

 

 

 

 

Draw money at home or load money on bankcard

.913

 

 

 

 

Count personal budget via Internet

.865

 

 

 

 

Pay e-commerce bills

.800

 

 

 

 

Pay bills faster

.747

 

 

 

 

Get bonus from transactions

.729

 

 

 

 

Pay bills cheaper

.716

 

 

 

 

Have personal education

.649

 

 

 

 

Have complete loan services via Internet

 

 

 

.822

 

Have less personal workload in e.g. bill payment

 

 

 

.538

 

I don't use Internet bank because

 

 

 

 

 

Use has been a disappointment

 

.870

 

 

 

Friends and relatives neither use it

 

.788

 

 

 

Heard it is complicated

 

.717

 

 

 

Security concerns

 

 

.796

 

 

Expensive start up

 

 

.777

 

 

Internet banking provides no paper quittance after payment

 

 

.577

 

 

Internet banking provides no personal service

 

 

.538

 

 

Internet banking is time consuming

 

 

 

 

.587

Use of computers / Internet is time consuming

 

 

 

 

.555

Initial eigenvalues

6.52

4.70

1.77

1.35

1.04

Total variance explained %

28.9

10.5

9.6

6.7

5.2

Notes:

Extraction method: Principal Axis Factoring

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization

Table 7 shows the summary of means of the variables, all of which were derived from a 7-point Likert scale from -3 (not at all important / strongly disagree) to 3 (very important / strongly agree).

Table 7. Summary of means

Attribute

Importance means

Std.Deviation

I would use the Internet bank if I could

 

 

Draw money at home or load money on bankcard

-1.26

2.24

Count personal budget via Internet

-1.72

1.94

Pay e-commerce bills

-1.75

1.93

Pay bills faster

-1.63

2.12

Get bonus from transactions

-0.51

2.49

Pay bills cheaper

-0.39

2.51

Have personal education

-0.73

2.44

Have complete loan services via Internet

-1.70

1.93

Have less personal workload in e.g. bill payment

-0.68

2.41

Notes: Scale (-3) not at all important to (3) Very important

 

 

I don't use Internet bank because

 

 

Use has been a disappointment

-1.71

1.94

Friends and relatives neither use it

-1.59

2.01

Heard it is complicated

-0.45

2.24

Security concerns

0.31

2.23

Expensive start up

-0.38

2.35

Internet banking provides no paper quittance after payment

0.01

2.34

Internet banking provides no personal service

0.71

2.42

Internet banking is time consuming

-0.46

2.24

Use of computers / Internet is time consuming

0.39

2.49

Notes: Scale (-3) strongly disagree to (3) strongly agree

 

 

Results presented in table 7 indicate that the main barrier for the adoption of Internet banking among non-users is the lack of personal service (mean 0.71), time-consuming (mean 0.39) and security concerns (mean 0.31). New service dimensions in Internet banking (factor 1) was loaded with negative mean scores. Hence, non-users do not find new services in Internet banking important, and they are not aware of the current services available in Internet banking either. This is obvious, because most of the non-users do not possess a computer to start with and are therefore unable to access Internet banking.

Total amount of 84.4 percent of the respondents considered Internet banking very secure, and 10.5 percent quite secure. Non-users were more skeptical about the security of Internet banking, possibly because in our sample they were elderly people, with less education and little computer experience.

Non-users rated the security of Internet banking on a scale from very minor barrier of adoption (-3) to a very significant barrier of adoption (3). The results suggest that 26.4 percent of the non-users found the security of Internet banking as a very important barrier to their Internet banking usage and 9.9 percent find it as a quite important barrier.

We conducted ANOVA tests to define the security concerns of non-users further.  In these tests, age had no significant impact on the security concerns, but household income had a small negative and education had a small positive influence in security concerns.

Conclusions

The typical user (=mode) of Internet banking in our study was found to be a well-educated (= college) male professional between 35 and 40 years of age.  This segment is a most interesting one for retail bankers, for these are the prime customers, much more than the typical (=mode) non-users who are less-educated (=high school or less) females over 50 years of age.   This shows that simple demographics are practicable in planning campaigns for getting people to transfer their banking to the Internet.

Another relevant factor in the adoption process is consumer's experience with computers.  People who are experienced with computers think positively about them and have positive perceptions about Internet banking. These perceptions are further related to the use and the intention to use Internet banking.

For some unexplained reason, a consumer's reference group had a slightly negative influence on Internet banking usage.  Security concerns were not found to have any impact on the adoption of Internet banking. This finding does not agree with the purportedly high concern by customers about security, which is published in several articles concerning Internet banking and e-commerce in general. Although security concerns may have influenced the decision of non-users to stay with the branch bank, the consumers who are familiar with the Internet in the first place have less security concerns.  This finding is not typical in earlier literature and it may reflect the fact that the one-time pad security device which is in use in Finland's Internet payments may have had positive results both in the amount of mis-use (=very small) and the consumers' perception about the safety of Internet banking.

In our study and especially in the personal interviews, elderly people associate a bank transaction with human interaction. The prospect of typing on a keyboard to carry out a bank transaction seems a too detached and insecure method of banking to these people.  This is one of the reasons of low Internet banking adoption rate among the senior citizens, who also seem to demand more social contacts than is possible with Internet banking. This points out the need for interactive web designs, or maybe new types of easy-to-use communicative terminals via newer digital channels.

Internet banking users indicated that convenience, speed and freedom of time and place were major reasons of their adoption the Internet banking in the first place.  This sets high requirements to the functioning of the Internet server of the bank, which must be available always with high bandwidth to avoid delays, and with convenient user interfaces to minimize time consumed.   The current trend of advanced Internet banks toward the inclusion of other commercial activities on their banking sites may be detrimental to their customer relationships.

Future research

From a theoretical perspective, future studies will need to be conducted to increase the merit and credibility of these findings. The fact that the survey was carried out only in Finland might have an effect on the results. Thus, our adoption model is based entirely on Finnish consumer data. Future studies could, for example, expand this research abroad, and if successful, compare cultural differences in attitude and behavior.

Another area of future studies could be segmentation based on demographics and attitudes. In a recent paper, Machauer and Morgner (2001), for example, have used attitudes as segmentation criteria. This research could be renewed in couple of years time to see how the adoption of Internet banking and the factors affecting it have developed. To understand to real speed of Internet banking adoption, a follow-up study using time series would be in order.

From a social and ethical stand point, we would be also interested in doing some future research concerning the customer groups, who are getting bypassed by the technological developments. How could such customer groups be better taken into account when designing the future services, and prevent them from not getting  overlooked.

References

Alexander, N. and Colgate, M. (2000), 'Retail financial services: transaction to relationship marketing' European Journal of Marketing, Vol.34 No.8, pp.938-953. 

Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), 'Understanding attitudes and predicting social change', Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

 Alfansi, L. and Sargeant, A. (2000), 'Market segmentation in the Indonesian banking sector: the relationship between demographics and desired customer benefits', International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.18 No.2, pp. 64-74.

 Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977), 'Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys', Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.14 No.4, pp.396-402. 

Au, A. K. and Enderwick, P. (2000), 'A cognitive model on attitude towards technology adoption', Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.15 No.4, pp.266-282.

 Bagozzi, R.P. (2000), 'On the concept of intentional social action in consumer behavior', Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.27 (December), pp.388-396.

Baumeister, R.F. (1982), 'A self-presentational view of social phenomena', Psychological Bulletin, Vol.91 No.1, pp.326.

Bergmann, T., Hannaford, J., William, J. and Wenner, J. (1990), 'Amount, timing, and value of financial incentives in mail surveys: does it make a difference', Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management and Applications, Vol.2 No.8, pp.30-36.

Birch, D. (1999), 'Mobile finance services: the Internet isn't the only digital channel to consumers', Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 4, No.1, pp.20-29.

Brennan, M. (1992), 'The effect of a monetary incentive on mail survey response rates: new data', Journal of Market Research Society, Vol.34 No.4, pp.173-177.

Crisp, B., Jarvenpaa, S. and Todd, P.A.  (1997), 'Individual differences and Internet shopping attitudes and intentions. University of Texas at Austin. Working Paper.

Computer Industry Almanac Inc (2000). Available: http://www.c-i-a.com/index.htm/

Churchill, G.A. (1995), Marketing research. Methodological foundations (6th edition), The Dryden Press, Forth Worth.

Daniel, E. (1999), 'Provision of electronic banking in the UK and the Republic of Ireland', International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.17 No.2, pp.72-82.

Davis, F.D., Bagozze, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), 'User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models', Management Science, Vol.35, pp.982-1003.

DeLone, W.H. (1988), 'Determinants of success for computer usage in small business', MIS Quarterly, Vol.12 No.1, pp.51-61.

Dorsch, M.J., Swanson, S.R. and Kelley, S.W. (1998), 'The role of relationship quality in the stratification of vendors as perceived by customers', Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.26 No.2, pp.128-142.

 Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1981), Applied regression analysis (2nd edition), Wiley, New York.

 Evans, P. and Wurster, T. (1997), 'Strategy and the new economics of information', Harvard Business Review, Vol.9-10, pp.71-82.

 Fishbein, M. (1967), Readings in attitude theory and measurement, Wiley, New York.

 Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

 Fisher, A. (2000). 'Internet buyers are not what you think', Fortune, Vol.141, No.1, pp.190-191.

 Gattiker, U.E., ed. (1992), Technology-mediated communication, New York: W. De Gruyter.

 Guerin, B. (1986), 'Mere presence effects in humans: a review', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.22 No.1, pp.38-77.

 Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tathem, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1995), 'Multivariate data analysis with readings', Prentice-Hall, NJ.

 Harrison, A.W. and Rainer, R.K. (1992), 'The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 93-111.

 Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. and Davis, G.B. (1995), 'Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.11 No.4, pp.87-114.

 Jayawardhena, C. and Foley, P. (2000), 'Changes in the banking sector - the case of Internet banking in the UK', Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, Vol.10 No.1, pp.19-30.

 Karjaluoto, H., Mattila, M. and Pento, T. (2001), 'Electronic banking in Finland - consumers' beliefs and reactions to a new delivery channel', Under review for Journal of Financial Services Marketing.

 Likert, R. (1932), 'A technique for the measurement of attitudes', Archives of Psychology, Vol.21 No.140, pp.5-54.

 Machauer, A. and Morgner, S. (2001), 'Segmentation of bank customers by expected benefits and attitudes', International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.19 No.1, pp.6-17.

 Malhorta, N. (1999), Marketing research: an applied orientation (3rd edition), Prentice-Hall, Sydney.

 Mattila, M. (2001), 'Essays on Consumers in the Dawn of Interactive banking', Dissertation, ER-Paino Ky, Lievestuore.

 Morton-Williams, J. and Young, P. (1987), 'Obtaining the survey interview - an analysis of tape recorded doorstep introductions', Journal of Market Research Society, Vol.29 No.1, pp.35-54.

 Nelson, D.L. (1990), 'Individual adjustment to information driven technologies: A critical review', MIS Quarterly, Vol.14 No.1, pp.79-100.

 Nummenmaa, T., Konttinen, R., Kuusinen, J. and Leskinen, E. (1997), Tutkimusaineiston analyysi, WSOY, Porvoo.

 Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory, Vol.2, McGraw-Hill, New York.

 Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J. and Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957), The measurement of meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

 Oyegoke, A. (1999), 'Surfing Europe', The Banker, Vol.2, pp.72-73.

 Pahkinen, E. and Lehtonen, R. (1989), Otanta-asetelmat ja tilastollinen analyysi, Painokaari Oy, Helsinki.

 Roemer, M. and Buhl, H.U. (1996), 'Das Web als Alternative zur Bankfiliale: Gestaltung Innovativer IKS fur das Direktbanking', Wirtschaftsinformatik, Vol.6, pp.565-577.

 Sathye, M. (1999), 'Adoption of Internet banking by Australian consumers: an  empirical investigation', International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.17 No.7, pp.324-334.

 Sheshunoff, A. (2000), 'Internet banking – un update from the frontlines', ABA Banking Journal, Vol.92 No.1, pp.51-55.

 Simonson, I and Nowlis, S.M. (2000), 'The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: unconventional choices based on reasons', Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (July), pp.49-68.

 Singer, E. (1978), 'Informed consent: consequences for response rate and response quality in social surveys', American Sociological Review, Vol.43 No.4, pp.144-162.

 Snyder, C.R. (1992), 'Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: a consumer catch-22 carousel?', Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol.13 No.3, pp.9-24.

 Snyder, C. R. anf Fromkin, H.L. (1977), 'Abnormality as a positive characteristic: the development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness', Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol.86 No.5, pp.518-527.

 Statistics Finland (2000), On the Road to the Finnish Information Society II, University Press, Helsinki.

 Taylor, M. (1991), The Fanatics. A behavioral approach to political violence, Brassey's, Sydney.

 Trocchia, P.J. and Janda, S. (2000), 'A phenomenological investigation of Internet usage among older individuals', Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.17 No.7, pp.605-616.

 Zineldin, M. (2000), 'Beyond relationship marketing: technologicalship marketing', Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol.18 No.1, pp.9-23.

 Zmud, R.W. (1979), 'Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature', Management Science, Vol.25 No.10, pp.966-979.